Rosa rubiginosa var. nemoralis

(Léman) Thory

in P. J. Redouté, Roses 2: 23. 1821.

Introduced
Basionym: Rosa nemoralis Léman Bull. Sci. Soc. Philom. Paris 1818: 94. 1818
Synonyms: R. micrantha Borrer
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 9. Treatment on page 91.

Prickles infrastipular and internodal, lengths ± uniform, aciculi and setae absent on flowering branches. Leaves: terminal blades mostly oval, 12–20 × 8–14 mm, apex usually obtuse, abaxial surfaces seldom densely glandular. Flowers 2–3.5 cm diam.; sepals deciduous before or as hips mature, styles usually glabrous, stylar orifice 1/5–1/6 diam. of rims 2.5–4 mm diam. Hips 10–12 × 7–9 mm. 2n = 35, 42.


Phenology: Flowering May–Aug.
Habitat: Thickets, clearings, roadsides
Elevation: 0–700 m

Distribution

V9 135-distribution-map.jpg

Introduced; N.S., Ont., P.E.I., Que., Conn., D.C., Ill., Ind., Ky., Maine, Md., Mass., Mo., N.J., N.Y., N.C., Ohio, Oreg., Pa., R.I., S.C., Tenn., Tex., Va., Wash., W.Va., Wis., Europe, introduced also in Pacific Islands (New Zealand), Australia.

Discussion

Variety nemoralis is often found near var. rubiginosa with apparently little or no ecological distinctions between them. They differ in morphological characters by degrees of expression rather than complete distinctions. The rank of variety follows, for example, the recommendation of H. J. Scoggan (1978–1979).

Selected References

None.

Lower Taxa

None.
Walter H. Lewis +, Barbara Ertter +  and Anne Bruneau +
(Léman) Thory +
Rosa nemoralis +
N.S. +, Ont. +, P.E.I. +, Que. +, Conn. +, D.C. +, Ill. +, Ind. +, Ky. +, Maine +, Md. +, Mass. +, Mo. +, N.J. +, N.Y. +, N.C. +, Ohio +, Oreg. +, Pa. +, R.I. +, S.C. +, Tenn. +, Tex. +, Va. +, Wash. +, W.Va. +, Wis. +, Europe +, introduced also in Pacific Islands (New Zealand) +  and Australia. +
0–700 m +
Thickets, clearings, roadsides +
Flowering May–Aug. +
in P. J. Redouté, Roses +
Introduced +
R. micrantha +
Rosa rubiginosa var. nemoralis +
Rosa rubiginosa +
variety +