Difference between revisions of "Amphiscirpus"

Oteng-Yeboah

Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 33: 308. 1974.

Etymology: Greek amphi- , doubtful, ambiguous, and Latin scirpus, bulrush
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 23. Treatment on page 27. Mentioned on page 7, 28.
FNA>Volume Importer
imported>Volume Importer
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 48: Line 48:
 
|publication year=1974
 
|publication year=1974
 
|special status=
 
|special status=
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f50eec43f223ca0e34566be0b046453a0960e173/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V23/V23_35.xml
+
|source xml=https://bibilujan@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/bb6b7e3a7de7d3b7888a1ad48c7fd8f5c722d8d6/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V23/V23_35.xml
 
|genus=Amphiscirpus
 
|genus=Amphiscirpus
 
}}<!--
 
}}<!--
  
 
-->[[Category:Treatment]][[Category:Cyperaceae]]
 
-->[[Category:Treatment]][[Category:Cyperaceae]]

Revision as of 21:33, 27 May 2020

Herbs, perennial, internally mostly solid, without evident air cavities, cespitose or not, rhizomatous. Culms solitary or not, ± terete, tough, wiry. Leaves all basal; sheaths often disintegrating into fibers; ligules ciliate; blades strongly C-shaped in cross section to subcylindric, tough, wiry. Inflorescences terminal, often pseudolateral, capitate; spikelets 1–6(–10); involucral bracts 1–3, spreading or erect, leaflike. Spikelets 5–20 × 3–5 mm; scales 30–60, spirally arranged, each subtending flower, smooth, glabrous, margins ciliolate. Flowers bisexual; perianth of 1–6 bristles, straight, not longer than achene, retrorsely spinulose; stamens 3; styles deciduous, linear, 2-fid. Achenes plano-convex or unequally biconvex.

Distribution

North America, South America.

Discussion

Species 1.

Amphiscirpus was segregated from Scirpus (A. A. Oteng-Yeboah 1974) mainly on the basis of the culm anatomy, including the absence of internal air cavities. It differs from all species of Schoenoplectus in its prominently ciliate ligules. Amphiscirpus was treated within the high Andean Phylloscirpus (J. J. Bruhl 1995) and also as a distinct, monotypic genus (P. Goetghebeur and D. A. Simpson 1991).