Search results
- Rumex conglomeratus often is confused with immature specimens of R. obtusifolius, as well as with other species (e.g., R. sanguineus). Its distribution4 KB (419 words) - 23:07, 5 November 2020
- pusillus (= P. × pusilliformis Fisher [P. × intermedius Fischer]), and P. obtusifolius × P. pusillus (= P. × saxonicus Hagström), have been described. Subspecies5 KB (437 words) - 19:33, 6 November 2020
- with other species having dentate inner tepals (e.g., R. dentatus, R. obtusifolius, and R. pulcher). Rumex paraguayensis and R. obovatus appear to belong4 KB (403 words) - 23:07, 5 November 2020
- midvein, chances are that it is subsp. tenuissimus. Only Potamogeton obtusifolius could be confused with the taxon, and it can be separated by having its4 KB (358 words) - 21:31, 5 November 2020
- were based on misidentified specimens of R. conglomeratus or immature R. obtusifolius. Rumex sanguineus is represented in Europe by at least two varieties4 KB (418 words) - 23:07, 5 November 2020
- crispus hybridizes with many other species of subg. Rumex. Hybrids with R. obtusifolius (Rumex ×pratensis Mertens & Koch) are the most common in the genus, at7 KB (723 words) - 23:07, 5 November 2020
- pusilliformis Fischer [P. × intermedius Fischer]) and P. friesii × P. obtusifolius (= P. × semifructus A. Bennett ex Ascherson & Graebner), have been described4 KB (428 words) - 21:30, 5 November 2020