Difference between revisions of "Talk:Imperata brevifolia"
RevisionBot (talk | contribs) (Bot: Adding {{TalkChanges|Original=Imperata brevifolia is listed as a noxious weed by the state of California. The reason for the listing is not clear; it may stem from confusion of this native species with one o) |
RevisionBot (talk | contribs) m (Bot: Adding {{TalkChanges|Original=[]|ChangedTo=In September 2003, G.F. Hrusa succeeded in persuading the California authorities that Imperata brevifolia should be taken off the state's noxious weed list. Endange) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{TalkChanges|Original=[]|ChangedTo=In September 2003, G.F. Hrusa succeeded in persuading the California authorities that Imperata brevifolia should be taken off the state's noxious weed list. Endangered species status is now being sought.|Location=discussion|Category=discussion|Reason=addition to text|FixedInFNA=yes|Comments=Added new comment about change of status, and modified section mentioning that I. brevifolia was put on noxious weed list in the first place (change to past tense)|Authority=V25: Additions, Corrections, and Comments, page 813, 2007|Volume=25}} | ||
| + | |||
{{TalkChanges|Original=Imperata brevifolia is listed as a noxious weed by the state of California. The reason for the listing is not clear; it may stem from confusion of this native species with one of the introduced weedy species.|ChangedTo=Imperata brevifolia was listed as a noxious weed by the state of California. The reason for the listing is not clear; it may have stemmed from confusion of this native species with one of the introduced weedy species.|Location=discussion|Category=discussion|Reason=addition to text|FixedInFNA=yes|Comments=|Authority=V25: Additions, Corrections, and Comments, page 813, 2007|Volume=25}} | {{TalkChanges|Original=Imperata brevifolia is listed as a noxious weed by the state of California. The reason for the listing is not clear; it may stem from confusion of this native species with one of the introduced weedy species.|ChangedTo=Imperata brevifolia was listed as a noxious weed by the state of California. The reason for the listing is not clear; it may have stemmed from confusion of this native species with one of the introduced weedy species.|Location=discussion|Category=discussion|Reason=addition to text|FixedInFNA=yes|Comments=|Authority=V25: Additions, Corrections, and Comments, page 813, 2007|Volume=25}} | ||
Latest revision as of 18:28, 28 May 2021
| Change made | |
|---|---|
| Original | [] |
| Changed to | In September 2003, G.F. Hrusa succeeded in persuading the California authorities that Imperata brevifolia should be taken off the state's noxious weed list. Endangered species status is now being sought. |
| Location | discussion |
| Category | discussion |
| Reason | addition to text |
| Volume | 25 |
| Authority | V25: Additions, Corrections, and Comments, page 813, 2007 |
| Fixed in FNA SMW | yes |
| Comments | Added new comment about change of status, and modified section mentioning that I. brevifolia was put on noxious weed list in the first place (change to past tense) |
| Change made | |
|---|---|
| Original | Imperata brevifolia is listed as a noxious weed by the state of California. The reason for the listing is not clear; it may stem from confusion of this native species with one of the introduced weedy species. |
| Changed to | Imperata brevifolia was listed as a noxious weed by the state of California. The reason for the listing is not clear; it may have stemmed from confusion of this native species with one of the introduced weedy species. |
| Location | discussion |
| Category | discussion |
| Reason | addition to text |
| Volume | 25 |
| Authority | V25: Additions, Corrections, and Comments, page 813, 2007 |
| Fixed in FNA SMW | yes |
| Comments |