Gen. Sp. Pl.,28. 1816
w North America, nw Mexico.
Species 13 (13 in the flora).
Eriophyllum encompasses taxa that occur in seashore, chaparral, grassland, desert, forest, and alpine communities. Their disparateness encouraged taxonomic multiplication. Between 1890 and 1937, about 157 designations under the genus existed (L. Constance 1937). Constance reduced that taxonomic thicket to six annual and five perennial species; the perennial species E. lanatum consisted of ten varieties. Base diploid chromosome numbers for Eriophyllum (in the sense of Constance) species are x = 4, 5, and 7 for the annuals, and x = 8, 15, and 19 for the perennials (S. Carlquist 1956; J. S. Mooring 1997, 2001, 2002). Possibly, x = 15 and x = 19 represent paleopolyploidy. Only E. mohavense remains uncounted. B. G. Baldwin (1999) linked Mooring’s (1997) report of n = 19 in E. nevinii to chromosomal, morphologic, and rDNA evidence, and erected the genus Constancea on that species. Eriophyllum (in the sense of Constance) seems most closely related to the annuals Pseudobahia (x = 3, 4, 8) and Syntrichopappus (x = 6, 7). Eriophyllum (in the sense of Baldwin), Pseudobahia, and Syntrichopappus constitute a clade, and nomenclatural changes are necessary for a monophyletic classification (Baldwin and B. L. Wessa 2000; Baldwin et al. 2002). Mooring (1997) hypothesized a descending dysploidy phylogeny in Eriophyllum (in the sense of Constance) from E. nevinii. Baldwin et al. (2002, p. 174) stated that E. nevinii “is an evolutionary outlier (although probably not ancestral) to” Eriophyllum in the sense of Constance.
Natural intertaxon hybrids have been reported for the perennial species (L. Constance 1937; J. S. Mooring 1994) but not for the annuals. Experimental hybridizations have produced sterile hybrids between the annual E. congdonii and the perennial E. lanatum. Experimental crosses among seven of the annual species produced fertile hybrids between two morphologically similar species; the other combinations either failed or produced sterile hybrids (Mooring 2002).
D. P. Tibor (2001) cited nine taxa of Eriophyllum as rare or endangered: the perennials E. confertiflorum var. tanacetiflorum, E. jepsonii, E. latilobum, E. (Constancea) nevinii, and E. lanatum vars. hallii and obovatum, and the annuals E. congdonii, E. mohavense, and E. nubigenum.
Here, accounts of the annuals are by D. E. Johnson, the perennials by J. S. Mooring.
|1||Perennials (sometimes flowering in first year), subshrubs, or shrubs, (10–)20–150 cm||> 2|
|1||Annuals, 1–15(–30) cm||> 6|
|2||Perennials or subshrubs; heads borne singly or 2–5(–10) per array; peduncles (2–)3–30 cm; ray laminae 6–20 mm||> 3|
|2||Subshrubs or shrubs; heads 2–30+, or 40–80+, per array; peduncles 0–10(–14) cm; ray laminae 2–10 mm||> 4|
|3||Peduncles 3–30 cm; involucres 6–15 mm diam.; ray florets 0, or 5–13(–15), lami-nae 6–20 mm; disc florets 20–300; British Columbia, w United States||Eriophyllum lanatum|
|3||Peduncles 2–7 cm; involucres 5–6(–7) mm diam.; ray florets (6–)8–10(–13), lami-nae 6–10 mm; disc florets 40–75; California||Eriophyllum latilobum|
|4||Subshrubs, 30–150 cm; phyllaries 8–11; ray florets 0, or 6–9, laminae 3–5 mm; coastal dunes and bluffs||Eriophyllum staechadifolium|
|4||Shrubs, 20–100 cm; phyllaries 4–8; ray florets 0, or 4–8, laminae 2–10 mm; mostly not coastal||> 5|
|5||Heads 2–4 per array; peduncles mostly 5–10(–14) cm; ray florets 6–8, laminae 6–10 mm; California (Inner Coast Ranges)||Eriophyllum jepsonii|
|5||Heads (3–)4–7(–10) or 10–30+ per array; peduncles mostly 0–2.5(–9) cm; ray florets 0 or 4–6(–8), laminae 2–5 mm; California, Mexico||Eriophyllum confertiflorum|
|6||Peduncles ± 0.1 cm||> 7|
|6||Peduncles 1–10 cm||> 9|
|7||Ray florets 5–7||Eriophyllum multicaule|
|7||Ray florets 0||> 8|
|8||Leaf margins weakly, if at all, revolute, apices acute; phyllaries 3–4||Eriophyllum mohavense|
|8||Leaf margins strongly revolute, apices ± rounded; phyllaries 6–8||Eriophyllum pringlei|
|9||Ray laminae cream or yellow, or white with red veins (lobes of disc corollas glandular; anther appendages subulate)||> 10|
|9||Ray laminae yellow (lobes of disc corollas not glandular; anther appendages deltate)||> 11|
|10||Ray laminae white with red veins; cypselae 2.5–4.5 mm; pappi of 5 subulate scales 1.5–2.5 mm plus 4 oblong scales ± 0.5 mm||Eriophyllum lanosum|
|10||Ray laminae usually cream or yellow, sometimes white with red veins; cypselae ± 2 mm; pappi usually of 6–10 ± oblong scales 0.4–0.8 mm, rarely 0||Eriophyllum wallacei|
|11||Anther appendages not glandular; pappi 0, or of 6–10 scales 0.1–0.5 mm||Eriophyllum ambiguum|
|11||Anther appendages glandular; pappi of 8–10 lanceolate to spatulate (± unequal) scales 0.5–1.5 mm, or of 3–5 ± spatulate scales 0.5–1 mm plus 3–5 lanceolate scales 1.5–2 mm.||> 12|
|12||Stems ascending; ray laminae ± 1 mm (inconspicuous); 1800–2500 m||Eriophyllum nubigenum|
|12||Stems ± spreading; ray laminae 3–5 mm; 500–1900 m||Eriophyllum congdonii|
|Author||Dale E. Johnson + and John S. Mooring +|
|Common name||Woolly sunflower +|
|Etymology||Greek erion, wool, and phyllon, leaf +|
|Illustrator||Yevonn Wilson-Ramsey +|
|Reference||constance1937a +, mooring1997a + and mooring2002a +|
|Taxon name||Eriophyllum +|
|Taxon parent||Asteraceae (tribe Heliantheae) subtribe Baeriinae +|
|Taxon rank||genus +|
|Volume||Volume 21 +|