Difference between revisions of "Penthoraceae"
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|distribution=North America;Europe (Russia);Asia. | |distribution=North America;Europe (Russia);Asia. | ||
|discussion=<p>Genus 1, species 2 (1 in the flora).</p><!-- | |discussion=<p>Genus 1, species 2 (1 in the flora).</p><!-- | ||
| − | --><p>The position of Penthorum within Rosales has been disputed extensively. A. Cronquist (1981) considered it to be transitional between Crassulaceae and Saxifragaceae. He included it in Saxifragaceae, stating that Penthorum was not distinct enough from Crassulaceae and Saxifragaceae to warrant being treated as a distinct family. Placement of the genus by others has depended on the morphological, anatomical, and embryological traits emphasized. Molecular studies suggest that the genus is sister to Haloragaceae (D. R. Morgan and D. E. Soltis 1993; D. E. Soltis and P. S. Soltis 1997). Recent authors often have placed it in the monogeneric Penthoraceae.</p> | + | --><p>The position of <i>Penthorum</i> within Rosales has been disputed extensively. A. Cronquist (1981) considered it to be transitional between Crassulaceae and Saxifragaceae. He included it in Saxifragaceae, stating that <i>Penthorum</i> was not distinct enough from Crassulaceae and Saxifragaceae to warrant being treated as a distinct family. Placement of the genus by others has depended on the morphological, anatomical, and embryological traits emphasized. Molecular studies suggest that the genus is sister to Haloragaceae (D. R. Morgan and D. E. Soltis 1993; D. E. Soltis and P. S. Soltis 1997). Recent authors often have placed it in the monogeneric Penthoraceae.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references={{Treatment/Reference | |references={{Treatment/Reference | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
|family=Penthoraceae | |family=Penthoraceae | ||
|illustrator=Barbara Alongi | |illustrator=Barbara Alongi | ||
| + | |illustration copyright=Flora of North America Association | ||
|distribution=North America;Europe (Russia);Asia. | |distribution=North America;Europe (Russia);Asia. | ||
|reference=baldwin1951a;haskins1987a;spongberg1972a | |reference=baldwin1951a;haskins1987a;spongberg1972a | ||
| Line 49: | Line 50: | ||
|publication year= | |publication year= | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V8/V8_478.xml |
}}<!-- | }}<!-- | ||
-->[[Category:Treatment]] | -->[[Category:Treatment]] | ||
Latest revision as of 23:44, 5 November 2020
Perennial herbs. Stems simple or branched. Leaves cauline, alternate, simple; stipules absent; petiole present or absent; blade margins sharply serrate or doubly serrate. Inflorescences terminal, scorpioid racemes. Flowers bisexual; perianth and androecium hypogynous or perigynous; hypanthium present; sepals 5(–8), connate proximally; petals absent or 1–8, distinct; nectary disc absent; stamens 10, distinct, adnate to rim of hypanthium; anthers dehiscent by longitudinal slits; pistils 1, (4–)5(–8)-carpellate, connate basally and laterally, partially adnate to hypanthium; ovary superior or partially inferior, (4–)5(–8)-locular proximally; placentation marginal; ovules anatropous, bitegmic, crassinucellate; styles 1 per carpel, distinct; stigmas 1 per carpel, terminal, capitate. Fruits capsular, dehiscence circumscissile proximal to free portion of styles. Seeds 300–400, tan, yellowish brown, or pinkish, ellipsoid to subfusiform, funicular end more tapered; embryo straight; endosperm scant, cellular.
Distribution
North America, Europe (Russia), Asia.
Discussion
Genus 1, species 2 (1 in the flora).
The position of Penthorum within Rosales has been disputed extensively. A. Cronquist (1981) considered it to be transitional between Crassulaceae and Saxifragaceae. He included it in Saxifragaceae, stating that Penthorum was not distinct enough from Crassulaceae and Saxifragaceae to warrant being treated as a distinct family. Placement of the genus by others has depended on the morphological, anatomical, and embryological traits emphasized. Molecular studies suggest that the genus is sister to Haloragaceae (D. R. Morgan and D. E. Soltis 1993; D. E. Soltis and P. S. Soltis 1997). Recent authors often have placed it in the monogeneric Penthoraceae.
