Difference between revisions of "Potentilla sierrae-blancae"

Wooton & Rydberg in P. A. Rydberg

in P. A. Rydberg, Monogr. N. Amer. Potentilleae, 2: 57, plate 18, figs. 3–5. 1898.

Common names: Sierra Blanca cinquefoil
Conservation concernEndemic
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 9. Treatment on page 182. Mentioned on page 177, 189.
FNA>Volume Importer
 
FNA>Volume Importer
Line 32: Line 32:
 
|distribution=N.Mex.
 
|distribution=N.Mex.
 
|discussion=<p>Of conservation concern.</p><!--
 
|discussion=<p>Of conservation concern.</p><!--
--><p>Potentilla sierrae-blancae is restricted to the White Mountains, Lincoln and Otero counties. P. A. Rydberg (1898, 1908d) and B. C. Johnston (1985) placed P. sierrae-blancae in sect. (or group) Aureae; the species fits well in sect. Concinnae, combining the few-flowered inflorescence of P. angelliae with the tridentate leaflets of P. bicrenata and P. johnstonii.</p>
+
--><p><i>Potentilla sierrae-blancae</i> is restricted to the White Mountains, Lincoln and Otero counties. P. A. Rydberg (1898, 1908d) and B. C. Johnston (1985) placed <i>P. sierrae-blancae</i> in sect. (or group) Aureae; the species fits well in sect. Concinnae, combining the few-flowered inflorescence of <i>P. angelliae</i> with the tridentate leaflets of <i>P. bicrenata</i> and <i>P. johnstonii</i>.</p>
 
|tables=
 
|tables=
 
|references=
 
|references=
Line 56: Line 56:
 
|publication year=1898
 
|publication year=1898
 
|special status=Conservation concern;Endemic
 
|special status=Conservation concern;Endemic
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/9216fc802291cd3df363fd52122300479582ede7/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_268.xml
+
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/8f726806613d60c220dc4493de13607dd3150896/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_268.xml
 
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae
 
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae
 
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae
 
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae

Revision as of 19:15, 18 September 2019

Stems 0.2–1 dm, lengths 1–1.5 times basal leaves. Basal leaves palmate, 2–8 cm; petiole 0.5–5 cm, straight hairs sparse to abundant, sometimes absent, ± appressed, 2–3 mm, usually ± stiff, cottony hairs absent, glands absent; leaflets (3–)4–5, at tip of leaf axis, separate, proximal pair separated from others by 0(–1) mm of leaf axis, central leaflets narrowly cuneate-oblanceolate, 0.8–2.2 × 0.2–0.5 cm, petiolules 0(–1) mm, less than distal 1/4 of margins incised 1/2–3/4 to midvein, teeth 1(–2) per side, ± separate, 1–2 mm, surfaces similar, green, straight hairs mostly absent (except on margins), appressed, 1–2 mm, stiff, cottony hairs absent, glands absent, rarely sparse. Inflorescences solitary flowers or 2–3-flowered. Pedicels 1–4 cm. Flowers: epicalyx bractlets narrowly to widely elliptic-ovate, 2–3.5 × 1–1.5 mm; hypanthium 3–5 mm diam.; sepals 3–5 mm, apex obtuse to acute; petals 5–7 × 4–6 mm; filaments 1–2 mm, anthers 0.4–0.8 mm; carpels 5–20, styles 2 mm. Achenes 1.5 mm, smooth.


Phenology: Flowering summer.
Habitat: Windswept barren ridges, subalpine grasslands, rock outcrops
Elevation: 2400–3700 m

Discussion

Of conservation concern.

Potentilla sierrae-blancae is restricted to the White Mountains, Lincoln and Otero counties. P. A. Rydberg (1898, 1908d) and B. C. Johnston (1985) placed P. sierrae-blancae in sect. (or group) Aureae; the species fits well in sect. Concinnae, combining the few-flowered inflorescence of P. angelliae with the tridentate leaflets of P. bicrenata and P. johnstonii.

Selected References

None.

Lower Taxa

None.
Barbara Ertter +
Wooton & Rydberg in P. A. Rydberg +
Concinnae +
Sierra Blanca cinquefoil +
2400–3700 m +
Windswept barren ridges, subalpine grasslands, rock outcrops +
Flowering summer. +
in P. A. Rydberg, Monogr. N. Amer. Potentilleae, +
Conservation concern +  and Endemic +
Potentilla sierrae-blancae +
Potentilla sect. Concinnae +
species +