Difference between revisions of "Sporobolus compositus var. compositus"

unknown
Synonyms: Sporobolus asper var. hookeri unknown Sporobolus undefined var. asper unknown
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 25. Treatment on page 122.
FNA>Volume Importer
FNA>Volume Importer
Line 22: Line 22:
 
-->{{Treatment/Body
 
-->{{Treatment/Body
 
|distribution=Ariz.;Oreg.;Wash.;Del.;Wis.;W.Va.;Minn.;N.Dak.;Nebr.;Okla.;S.Dak.;Wyo.;N.J.;B.C.;Man.;N.B.;Ont.;Que.;Conn.;Mass.;R.I.;La.;Tenn.;N.Y.;Pa.;Ill.;Ind.;Ky.;Md.;Mich.;N.C.;Ohio;Utah;Vt.;Va.;Colo.;Ala.;Ark.;Iowa;Idaho;N.Mex.;Maine;Tex.;Kans.;Mont.;Mo.;Miss.
 
|distribution=Ariz.;Oreg.;Wash.;Del.;Wis.;W.Va.;Minn.;N.Dak.;Nebr.;Okla.;S.Dak.;Wyo.;N.J.;B.C.;Man.;N.B.;Ont.;Que.;Conn.;Mass.;R.I.;La.;Tenn.;N.Y.;Pa.;Ill.;Ind.;Ky.;Md.;Mich.;N.C.;Ohio;Utah;Vt.;Va.;Colo.;Ala.;Ark.;Iowa;Idaho;N.Mex.;Maine;Tex.;Kans.;Mont.;Mo.;Miss.
|discussion=<p><i>Sporobolus compositus </i>var.<i> compositus</i> is the most widespread of the three varieties, being found through¬out most of the range shown for the species, but not in South Carolina or Florida.</p>
+
|discussion=<p>Sporobolus compositus var. compositus is the most widespread of the three varieties, being found through¬out most of the range shown for the species, but not in South Carolina or Florida.</p>
 
|tables=
 
|tables=
 
|references=
 
|references=
Line 38: Line 38:
 
|basionyms=
 
|basionyms=
 
|family=Poaceae
 
|family=Poaceae
 +
|illustrator=Linda A. Vorobik and Hana Pazdírková
 
|distribution=Ariz.;Oreg.;Wash.;Del.;Wis.;W.Va.;Minn.;N.Dak.;Nebr.;Okla.;S.Dak.;Wyo.;N.J.;B.C.;Man.;N.B.;Ont.;Que.;Conn.;Mass.;R.I.;La.;Tenn.;N.Y.;Pa.;Ill.;Ind.;Ky.;Md.;Mich.;N.C.;Ohio;Utah;Vt.;Va.;Colo.;Ala.;Ark.;Iowa;Idaho;N.Mex.;Maine;Tex.;Kans.;Mont.;Mo.;Miss.
 
|distribution=Ariz.;Oreg.;Wash.;Del.;Wis.;W.Va.;Minn.;N.Dak.;Nebr.;Okla.;S.Dak.;Wyo.;N.J.;B.C.;Man.;N.B.;Ont.;Que.;Conn.;Mass.;R.I.;La.;Tenn.;N.Y.;Pa.;Ill.;Ind.;Ky.;Md.;Mich.;N.C.;Ohio;Utah;Vt.;Va.;Colo.;Ala.;Ark.;Iowa;Idaho;N.Mex.;Maine;Tex.;Kans.;Mont.;Mo.;Miss.
 
|reference=None
 
|reference=None
Line 43: Line 44:
 
|publication year=
 
|publication year=
 
|special status=
 
|special status=
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f6b125a955440c0872999024f038d74684f65921/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V25/V25_196.xml
+
|source xml=https://bibilujan@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/314eb390f968962f596ae85f506b4b3db8683b1b/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V25/V25_196.xml
 
|subfamily=Poaceae subfam. Chloridoideae
 
|subfamily=Poaceae subfam. Chloridoideae
 
|tribe=Poaceae tribe Cynodonteae
 
|tribe=Poaceae tribe Cynodonteae

Revision as of 17:17, 30 October 2019

Plants not rhizomatous. Culms stout, 2-5 mm thick. Uppermost sheaths usually 2.6-6 mm wide. Panicles with 30-90 spikelets per cm2 when pressed. Fruits 1-1.8 mm.

Distribution

Ariz., Oreg., Wash., Del., Wis., W.Va., Minn., N.Dak., Nebr., Okla., S.Dak., Wyo., N.J., B.C., Man., N.B., Ont., Que., Conn., Mass., R.I., La., Tenn., N.Y., Pa., Ill., Ind., Ky., Md., Mich., N.C., Ohio, Utah, Vt., Va., Colo., Ala., Ark., Iowa, Idaho, N.Mex., Maine, Tex., Kans., Mont., Mo., Miss.

Discussion

Sporobolus compositus var. compositus is the most widespread of the three varieties, being found through¬out most of the range shown for the species, but not in South Carolina or Florida.

Selected References

None.

Lower Taxa

None.
Paul M. Peterson +, Stephan L. Hatch +  and Alan S. Weakley +
unknown +
Ariz. +, Oreg. +, Wash. +, Del. +, Wis. +, W.Va. +, Minn. +, N.Dak. +, Nebr. +, Okla. +, S.Dak. +, Wyo. +, N.J. +, B.C. +, Man. +, N.B. +, Ont. +, Que. +, Conn. +, Mass. +, R.I. +, La. +, Tenn. +, N.Y. +, Pa. +, Ill. +, Ind. +, Ky. +, Md. +, Mich. +, N.C. +, Ohio +, Utah +, Vt. +, Va. +, Colo. +, Ala. +, Ark. +, Iowa +, Idaho +, N.Mex. +, Maine +, Tex. +, Kans. +, Mont. +, Mo. +  and Miss. +
Sporobolus asper var. hookeri +  and Sporobolus undefined var. asper +
Sporobolus compositus var. compositus +
Sporobolus compositus +
variety +