Difference between revisions of "Brothera leana"
Gen. Musc. Frond., 258. 1901,.
Basionym: Leucophanes leanum Sullivant Musc. Allegh., 41. 1846
Synonyms: Campylopus leanus (Sullivant) Sullivant & Lesquereux Leucobryum leanum (Sullivant) Kindberg Syrrhopodon leanus (Sullivant) Lesquereux & James
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 27. Treatment on page 366.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|place=258. 1901, | |place=258. 1901, | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/ | + | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym |
|name=Leucophanes leanum | |name=Leucophanes leanum | ||
|authority=Sullivant | |authority=Sullivant | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
| + | |publication_title=Musc. Allegh., | ||
| + | |publication_place=41. 1846 | ||
}} | }} | ||
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | |synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Campylopus leanus | |name=Campylopus leanus | ||
|authority=(Sullivant) Sullivant & Lesquereux | |authority=(Sullivant) Sullivant & Lesquereux | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | |rank=species |
| + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Leucobryum leanum | |name=Leucobryum leanum | ||
|authority=(Sullivant) Kindberg | |authority=(Sullivant) Kindberg | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | |rank=species |
| + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Syrrhopodon leanus | |name=Syrrhopodon leanus | ||
|authority=(Sullivant) Lesquereux & James | |authority=(Sullivant) Lesquereux & James | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Dicranaceae;Brothera;Brothera leana | |hierarchy=Dicranaceae;Brothera;Brothera leana | ||
| Line 33: | Line 39: | ||
|elevation=0-2000 m | |elevation=0-2000 m | ||
|distribution=Ark.;Ill.;Iowa;Ky.;Md.;Minn.;Miss.;Mo.;N.C.;Ohio;Pa.;S.C.;Tenn.;Va.;W.Va.;Wis.;Mexico;Central America (Guatemala);Asia;Africa (Malawi). | |distribution=Ark.;Ill.;Iowa;Ky.;Md.;Minn.;Miss.;Mo.;N.C.;Ohio;Pa.;S.C.;Tenn.;Va.;W.Va.;Wis.;Mexico;Central America (Guatemala);Asia;Africa (Malawi). | ||
| − | |discussion=<p>Brothera leana is easily identified by clusters of brood leaves always present in the comal tufts. Campylopus fragilis has a similar appearance, but it has a different transverse section of the costa, with dorsal instead of median stereids. Furthermore, the ranges of the two species in North America do not overlap.</p> | + | |discussion=<p><i>Brothera leana</i> is easily identified by clusters of brood leaves always present in the comal tufts. <i>Campylopus fragilis</i> has a similar appearance, but it has a different transverse section of the costa, with dorsal instead of median stereids. Furthermore, the ranges of the two species in North America do not overlap.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 42: | Line 48: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Brothera leana | name=Brothera leana | ||
| − | |||
|authority=(Sullivant) Müller Hal. | |authority=(Sullivant) Müller Hal. | ||
|rank=species | |rank=species | ||
| Line 56: | Line 61: | ||
|publication year= | |publication year= | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V27/V27_513.xml |
|genus=Brothera | |genus=Brothera | ||
|species=Brothera leana | |species=Brothera leana | ||
Latest revision as of 22:26, 5 November 2020
Leaves 2–3 mm; margins entire; costa 155–180 µm wide; basal laminal cells 19–55 × 4–19 µm, narrower at margins; distal laminal cells 24–55 × 3–7 µm. Specialized asexual reproduction by clusters of spindle-shaped brood leaves in the comal tufts. Sporophytes not found in North America.
Habitat: Humic or peaty soil, rocks, especially sandstone bluffs, rotten wood, rarely bark of trees
Elevation: 0-2000 m
Distribution
Ark., Ill., Iowa, Ky., Md., Minn., Miss., Mo., N.C., Ohio, Pa., S.C., Tenn., Va., W.Va., Wis., Mexico, Central America (Guatemala), Asia, Africa (Malawi).
Discussion
Brothera leana is easily identified by clusters of brood leaves always present in the comal tufts. Campylopus fragilis has a similar appearance, but it has a different transverse section of the costa, with dorsal instead of median stereids. Furthermore, the ranges of the two species in North America do not overlap.
Selected References
None.
Lower Taxa
None.