Difference between revisions of "Micropsis dasycarpa"

(Grisebach) Beauverd

Bull. Soc. Bot. Genève, sér. 2, 5: 224. 1913.

Common names: Bighead straitjackets
IntroducedIllustrated
Basionym: Filago dasycarpa Grisebach Abh. Königl. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen 24: 185. 1879
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 19. Treatment on page 465. Mentioned on page 457.
FNA>Volume Importer
imported>Volume Importer
Line 8: Line 8:
 
}}
 
}}
 
|common_names=Bighead straitjackets
 
|common_names=Bighead straitjackets
 +
|special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status
 +
|code=I
 +
|label=Introduced
 +
}}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status
 +
|code=F
 +
|label=Illustrated
 +
}}
 
|basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym
 
|basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym
 
|name=Filago dasycarpa
 
|name=Filago dasycarpa
Line 30: Line 37:
 
|elevation=± 20 m
 
|elevation=± 20 m
 
|distribution=Tex.;se South America.
 
|distribution=Tex.;se South America.
 +
|introduced=true
 
|discussion=<p><i>Micropsis dasycarpa</i> is known in the flora area from one gathering (Victoria County, Gulf Coast prairie with Mimosa strigillosa Torrey & A. Gray, in 1987). For this treatment, I have assumed the Texas population to be a recent introduction; R. Barneby provided evidence that <i>M. dasycarpa</i> could be an overlooked amphitropical native (J. D. Morefield 2004; see also discussion under 101. <i>Psilocarphus</i>).</p>
 
|discussion=<p><i>Micropsis dasycarpa</i> is known in the flora area from one gathering (Victoria County, Gulf Coast prairie with Mimosa strigillosa Torrey & A. Gray, in 1987). For this treatment, I have assumed the Texas population to be a recent introduction; R. Barneby provided evidence that <i>M. dasycarpa</i> could be an overlooked amphitropical native (J. D. Morefield 2004; see also discussion under 101. <i>Psilocarphus</i>).</p>
 
|tables=
 
|tables=
Line 53: Line 61:
 
|publication title=Bull. Soc. Bot. Genève, sér.
 
|publication title=Bull. Soc. Bot. Genève, sér.
 
|publication year=1913
 
|publication year=1913
|special status=
+
|special status=Introduced;Illustrated
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f50eec43f223ca0e34566be0b046453a0960e173/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V19-20-21/V19_775.xml
+
|source xml=https://bibilujan@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/bb6b7e3a7de7d3b7888a1ad48c7fd8f5c722d8d6/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V19-20-21/V19_775.xml
 
|tribe=Asteraceae tribe Gnaphalieae
 
|tribe=Asteraceae tribe Gnaphalieae
 
|genus=Micropsis
 
|genus=Micropsis

Revision as of 21:40, 27 May 2020

Plants mostly 5–8 cm. Leaves 6–9 × 2–4 mm. Heads congested distally, mostly 4–5 mm. Bisexual corollas: lobes usually 4.


Phenology: Flowering and fruiting Mar–May.
Habitat: Drying mud at edge of pool
Elevation: ± 20 m

Distribution

V19-775-distribution-map.gif

Introduced; Tex., se South America.

Discussion

Micropsis dasycarpa is known in the flora area from one gathering (Victoria County, Gulf Coast prairie with Mimosa strigillosa Torrey & A. Gray, in 1987). For this treatment, I have assumed the Texas population to be a recent introduction; R. Barneby provided evidence that M. dasycarpa could be an overlooked amphitropical native (J. D. Morefield 2004; see also discussion under 101. Psilocarphus).

Selected References

None.

Lower Taxa

None.