Difference between revisions of "Nymphaea odorata subsp. tuberosa"
Rhodora 96: 170. 1994.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|common_names=Nymphéa tubéreux | |common_names=Nymphéa tubéreux | ||
|special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status | |special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=W1 | ||
| + | |label= | ||
| + | }}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
|code=E | |code=E | ||
|label=Endemic | |label=Endemic | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
|basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym | ||
|name=Nymphaea tuberosa | |name=Nymphaea tuberosa | ||
|authority=Paine | |authority=Paine | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
|publication_title=Cat. Pl. Oneida Co., | |publication_title=Cat. Pl. Oneida Co., | ||
|publication_place=132. 1865 | |publication_place=132. 1865 | ||
| Line 36: | Line 37: | ||
|elevation=100-400 m | |elevation=100-400 m | ||
|distribution=Man.;Ont.;Que.;Conn.;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;Maine;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Mo.;Nebr.;N.H.;N.Y.;Ohio;Okla.;Pa.;Vt.;Wis. | |distribution=Man.;Ont.;Que.;Conn.;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;Maine;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Mo.;Nebr.;N.H.;N.Y.;Ohio;Okla.;Pa.;Vt.;Wis. | ||
| − | |discussion=<p>This taxon, which has been included within <i>Nymphaea odorata</i> by some recent workers, was formerly almost universally accepted as a distinct species. In the southern parts of the range of < | + | |discussion=<p>This taxon, which has been included within <i>Nymphaea odorata</i> by some recent workers, was formerly almost universally accepted as a distinct species. In the southern parts of the range of <i></i>subsp.<i> tuberosa</i>, where <i></i>subsp.<i> odorata</i> is absent, <i></i>subsp.<i> tuberosa</i> is easily distinguished morphologically from <i></i>subsp.<i> odorata</i>. Farther north, where their ranges overlap, the distinctions break down in some populations but are maintained in others. Some western populations are probably the result of introductions. A pink-flowered form seen in southeastern Ohio appears to be derived from this subspecies.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 45: | Line 46: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Nymphaea odorata subsp. tuberosa | name=Nymphaea odorata subsp. tuberosa | ||
| − | |||
|authority=(Paine) Wiersema & Hellquist | |authority=(Paine) Wiersema & Hellquist | ||
|rank=subspecies | |rank=subspecies | ||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
|publication title=Rhodora | |publication title=Rhodora | ||
|publication year=1994 | |publication year=1994 | ||
| − | |special status=Endemic | + | |special status=W1;Endemic |
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V3/V3_1147.xml |
|genus=Nymphaea | |genus=Nymphaea | ||
|species=Nymphaea odorata | |species=Nymphaea odorata | ||
Latest revision as of 22:46, 5 November 2020
Rhizomes often constricted at branch joints to form detachable tubers. Leaves: petiole green with brown-purple stripes, stout. Leaf blade abaxially green or faintly purple. Flowers: petals white, rarely pink, elliptic to oblanceolate, outer usually with broadly rounded apex. Seeds mostly 2.8-4.5 mm.
Phenology: Flowering late spring–summer.
Habitat: Mainly alkaline ponds, lakes, and sluggish streams and rivers, usually in very oozy sediments
Elevation: 100-400 m
Distribution
Man., Ont., Que., Conn., Ill., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Maine, Mass., Mich., Minn., Mo., Nebr., N.H., N.Y., Ohio, Okla., Pa., Vt., Wis.
Discussion
This taxon, which has been included within Nymphaea odorata by some recent workers, was formerly almost universally accepted as a distinct species. In the southern parts of the range of subsp. tuberosa, where subsp. odorata is absent, subsp. tuberosa is easily distinguished morphologically from subsp. odorata. Farther north, where their ranges overlap, the distinctions break down in some populations but are maintained in others. Some western populations are probably the result of introductions. A pink-flowered form seen in southeastern Ohio appears to be derived from this subspecies.
Selected References
None.